Gambling industry in France can be traced to 15th century when the Queen was added to the pack of cards used in poker, and in the process replaced the card that was removed with a male nobleman. France casino has also played a major role in the development of some of the most common casino games. The game of roulette, for instance, is said to have been invented by a French mathematician, named Blaise Pascal, in the 17th century.
In addition, a popular type of betting by the name Pari-Mutuel is rumored to have been by the French in the period circa 1870. Some unconfirmed reports also link the blackjack poker game to French origins. The history of poker is long and convoluted, but it no doubt denies the crucial role that France casino has lent to the modern gambling community.
Unlike most countries, casino en ligne is legal in France, and also, beginning 1987, the minimum age in which a person must have attained in order to participate in gambling was reduced from 21 to 18, allowing more people to join the gambling community. In 1988, the ban on slot machines was lifted, much to the joy of the game’s lovers.
In France, two bodies are charged with the responsibility of regulating the gambling industry and they include Pari Mutuel Urbain or PMU and Francaise des Jeux or simply FDJ. While PMU deals solely with horse racing, FDJ is the body that regulates tropezia palace games and lotteries. Both of these regulators are owned by the French government.
In 2010, the French government lifted the ban on online gambling and appointed a body (ARJEL) which is the authority that regulates the online games. This began in 2005, and was triggered by the European Commission’s investigation into the French gambling market. This led to the government requesting to repeal the gambling laws, so as to comply with the EU laws.
The process of legalization of online gambling by France casino continued in 2009, where the government introduced a bill, which led to the partial opening of the gambling market to the European Union members. However, the bill was met with criticism that the main provisions of the bill offered unfavorable conditions for new entrants while being lenient on the state-owned operators. Unfavorable taxing regime and low payment to players, as well as the overly stringent requirements, were among the things cited as the main concerns.